|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Bart Starr
Aggressive Structural Steel Expediting Services
16
   |
Posted - 2012.09.21 15:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
Anosha de'Cavemann wrote:As an uber-noob player, this thread as been extemely information.
- Lot's of what not to do's
- Lot's of game mechanics I wasn't aware of.
- Lot's of things to further research.
- How lively these forums can be.
Thanks to all.
Please take your positive attitude somewhere else, thx. |
Bart Starr
Aggressive Structural Steel Expediting Services
29
|
Posted - 2012.09.23 18:48:00 -
[2] - Quote
Kheeria wrote:John Ratcliffe wrote:WTFAMILOOKINGAT wrote:Your suggestion is one of the stupidest things I've seen on the forums. That's just what we need, restricting people from what systems they can jump into  Here's a thought, perhaps don't fly through the system where people are getting ganked? You can't have read many stupid things on the forums then, because it's an awesome suggestion. I've never played an MMO other than Eve which allows you to: 1. Attack member of your own side 2. Grief so blatantly without developer intervention It needs to be fixed. Even if it only applied to High-Sec that would be better than nothing. Seriously, WoW seems a much better game for you, I suggest you leave Eve and go play it instead. Either that or don't fly what you can't afford to lose.
Dude this guy is trolling.
Nobody is that blinded by hate for Goons and 'griefers' that they would screw up the entire game just to spite them. |
Bart Starr
Aggressive Structural Steel Expediting Services
86
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 23:17:00 -
[3] - Quote
Xolve wrote:D'Om K'vash wrote: if high sec freighter pilots are to be put under a rule that was made for null sec super caps to prevent them from logging off then they should be given super cap defensive capabilities. You're absolutely correct space friend, give freighters super capital defensive capabilities, along with the pricetag, and inability to dock in stations... Oh wait- did that just break the purpose of them being freighters?
No, sir, I think you misunderstand.
He wants supercapital EHP for freighters without any of the disadvantages.
Or he wants logoffski somehow returned to highsec because everyone knows that "unplug internet cable = escape certain death" is a winning concept.
Or he wants to make bumping 'indefinitely' a banning offense. Not sure what that accomplishes because it seems that Goons only bump targets long enough to kill them with blasters. They bump them for 150-200K EHP. Hardly 'indefinitely'. |
Bart Starr
Aggressive Structural Steel Expediting Services
109
|
Posted - 2012.10.06 23:18:00 -
[4] - Quote
Silence iKillYouu wrote:Freighters could use fitting and rig slots.
Bumping should cause damage.
Would be easy to give fitting slots to freighter.
Bumping causing damage is just stupid. Take a look at Jita 4-4 undock sometime.
You also realize that if you gave freighters fitting and rig slots, the base statistics would have to be significantly reduced for both cargo and EHP.
Then the freighter pilots would proceed to fit their freighters with Cargo Expanders, kill their EHP - and get blown out of the water with even less effort than today. (And the best EHP mod -DC II's- don't really work while autopiloting, just saying.......)
We've already seen this with phenomenon with miners. They'd cargo fit, get killed and make loud unpleasant noises to CCP.
Eventually CCP decided that miners were simply too stupid to fit properly, and took the decision out of their hands entirely.
Not making this up, we've seen it. |
|
|
| |
|